Devil’s Advocate on Facebook Privacy

Looking at the Facebook Privacy issue from a different angle has me playing “devil’s advocate.”

Privat painted on road

My husband and I finished reading, “The Facebook fishbowl” from the Sunday edition of The San Joaquin Herald and were borderline disgusted with the “status updates” people will put on their Facebook Pages. While I realize that many people use little language filters, I didn’t realize that people are putting things such as:

Women putting status updates about driving to the hospital for abortions and even a high school senior letting his network know he had an STD.

My husband looked at me and said, “Sarah, Facebook really needs to do something about their privacy issue.” (Sarcastic.)

According to the article, ‘”People report in studies that they care deeply about privacy,” said Ryan Calo, a fellow at Standford Law School’s Center for Internet and Society. “But then people don’t seem to act in a way that protects their privacy.”‘

Facebook may be coming under a lot of scrutiny for the privacy (or lack thereof) their platform provides, but I can’t help but wonder: With more than 400 million people utilizing the site (and 30% within the U.S.), at what point does the word “private” almost become “arbitrary?” Of course you won’t have privacy when you don’t keep the “intimacy” in “privacy.”

I’d love to hear your thoughts! What do you think? Is Facebook doing enough on their end, but taking the blame for the “Facebook-ees” who are not doing their part? Or has Facebook merely shaped this “unprivate” environment and they are the ones who need to fix it?